hello.
i was looking at the aubio pages when noted this call for logos.
nr 1 seems to be the easiest to understand and also to use it in small resolution logos (32 x 32 pixel icons). then, nr 6 seems to be also a genial idea to merge time and frequency into one sign … one day maybe it will be part of ascii . in short: nice work! congrats.
mrn
As an icon, the look of #2 is my fav, but the idea behind #4 is nice. I also like the final symbol in #6, maybe just use it by itself?
Is this logo ever going to be used as an icon? Aubio is a library after all, not a GUI program that needs to be launched, so a more complex design would be just fine.
As a complex logo, numbers 7 and 9 are good (2 still holds it’s own). I like the realism of 9 (but the clock is too small), and the multiple tools in 7 (suggests multiple abilities).
I like the idea of #3, except perhaps that the “wave” idea is a bit overused. Pitchforks are more original.
Anyways, I would try to keep it simple and clean.
Specially, because aubio is going to be a *component* in other systems. If I was to release a software package that uses aubio, I would like to put e.g. a “powered by aubio pitch detection” logo on site and/or splash screen. In that scenario, it would be better if the aubio logo wouldn’t stand out more than the main app logo (in term of colors, complexity, size, etc.).
In need of visual and/or interaction design? Logos, illustrations, layouts, interfaces, system architecture. Not limited to free/open-source software projects.
Get in contact!
Flattr
Do you enjoy my blog? You can show your appreciation and support my pro bono work via Flattr.
hello.
i was looking at the aubio pages when noted this call for logos.
nr 1 seems to be the easiest to understand and also to use it in small resolution logos (32 x 32 pixel icons). then, nr 6 seems to be also a genial idea to merge time and frequency into one sign … one day maybe it will be part of ascii . in short: nice work! congrats.
mrn
As an icon, the look of #2 is my fav, but the idea behind #4 is nice. I also like the final symbol in #6, maybe just use it by itself?
Is this logo ever going to be used as an icon? Aubio is a library after all, not a GUI program that needs to be launched, so a more complex design would be just fine.
As a complex logo, numbers 7 and 9 are good (2 still holds it’s own). I like the realism of 9 (but the clock is too small), and the multiple tools in 7 (suggests multiple abilities).
Could always combine a pitchfork and a wave, so the wave is coming out of where the pitchfork touches a surface
I like the idea of #3, except perhaps that the “wave” idea is a bit overused. Pitchforks are more original.
Anyways, I would try to keep it simple and clean.
Specially, because aubio is going to be a *component* in other systems. If I was to release a software package that uses aubio, I would like to put e.g. a “powered by aubio pitch detection” logo on site and/or splash screen. In that scenario, it would be better if the aubio logo wouldn’t stand out more than the main app logo (in term of colors, complexity, size, etc.).
I don’t understand #5 at all, btw.
Just 2ยข.